|
July 31, 2003
Science!
RIAA detector
July 30, 2003
Tech
Dean again
Also notable is that that Wilgoren and Rosenbaum talked to somebody other than Republican lackey Garrison Nelson, UVM History professor and longtime Dean hater. First time I've ever seen that outside Vermont.
July 29, 2003
Why work? We actively promote alternatives to the wage slavery mindset and what we call "The Cult of the Job" which automatically equates having a job with making a living.Lots of occasionally broken links to articles like this one, which contain germs of good ideas but cause one to wonder, Will my brain atrophy this badly, too, if I find some way of not having a job?
It turns out that the only problem with most of these schemes is the need for money: mortgages, food, and health care aren't free. It's kind of fun to imagine just how catastrophically society would crumble if they suddenly were, and everyone stopped going to work. I, for example, would write many, many small bits of software that wouldn't help you (nor probably my current employer) in the slightest; or I'd figure out some way of getting my house off the electric grid. Or I'd spend a lot of time raising my kid. Either way would be good.
July 25, 2003
Tufte Let's all take a minute and thank Edward R. Tufte for making this sort of thing desirable again. (Cosmic irony: I found PowerPoint to be the least annoying available product with which to design the page in question...)
July 24, 2003
Potato
My dad's friend Jim (How is it possible that Jim has no web presence, having kept me interested in physics and computers since I was wee...?) says he used to worry about this kind of thing when he was flying satellites for NASA; the orbits would get slightly screwed up when they flew over one of the parts with stronger or weaker gravity than normal, and they'd need to preemptively nudge the satellite up or down to compensate. Apparently the gravity map was less precise back in the day. Bitchin picture, huh?
Cord
July 22, 2003
Baby Gross Wanted to let you know that my water broke in the middle of the night last night so Baby Gross is on the way. We are at home now (we spent a few quality hours at the hospital before being sent home)and expect to go back to the hospital early this afternoon.Updates as they arrive. [Update: Aaron James Gross arrived 5:57 PM. All are well.] [Other update: He's ridiculously cute. 7.50 pounds.] [permalink | reply | tb ]
July 21, 2003
Meanwhile, across town...
Safer
Islands
A "vintage baseball" game with Civil War era rules (hit the ball too far and it's a foul, not a home run, etc.) was to be played later in the day, but we had checked out the whole island already and were ready to get back to the suburbs and do something more productive with our afternoon than check out the fort again, so we ate lunch under a tree while watching a (possibly equally entertaining) wiffle ball game played by some of the rapidly increasing throng of high schoolers. As soon as I figure out why I'm getting "file too large" errors I'll throw a picture or two up. (Yes, I know, it's because the file is too large.)
July 18, 2003
Bingo
Spam We can supply you with high-quality, artistic, and customized paper-cuts. Our paper-cuts are developed for all kinds of use in both daily life and business. ... Exoticism: All of our paper cuts are handmade by folk experts in China, where paper-cutting has been a traditional folk art dated back to 105 A.D.I laughed so hard that my penis enlarged and my bank account was filled with Nigerian millions. [permalink | reply | tb ]
July 17, 2003
Mix-a-lot
Excellent news
New way home I'm not scaredIt's a Foo Fighters song. This stanza is in 4/5 time, and repeats one or two dozen times, with a typical switch from whispering to screaming about halfway through. Among Kara's astonishingly few flaws is that she hates the part after the switch; the baby's gonna love it, tho. [permalink | reply | tb ]
Tired
July 16, 2003
[permalink | reply | tb ]
Dog The incident started when Connecticut's ''first dog'' jumped out of a window in Rowland's car as the governor was touring a new building at the University of Connecticut's Waterbury campus. Coalby bolted down East Main Street, up a hill and over a green, with two city police officers on bicycles in dogged pursuit. The three-mile chase ended when the officers shouted at a Wolcott man, Ed Humel, who grabbed the canine in his arms.Or maybe you have to be the governor. So a correction is in order: if you're a kid and you're worried that your dog might run away, move immediately to Connecticut and become that state's governor. [permalink | reply | tb ]
July 15, 2003
Clyde
Quack
Great White North
July 14, 2003
Apex and TERK
Brits on Dean But that is the nature of politics in New Hampshire, a peaceful prosperous state with the jarringly inappropriate motto "Live free or die". Through historical accident, the place has become a crucial early hoop the candidates have to jump through and survive if they are to get a shot at the presidency. Consequently, contenders for the most powerful job in the history of the world have to spend weeks courting the state house by house, schmoozing voters in their own back gardens. It is an odd arrangement - a bit like giving Northumbrians an early say in who becomes prime minister.No more politics for a while, chump. [permalink | reply | tb ]
July 11, 2003
Speaking of piracy
Beatty on Blumenthal
July 10, 2003
Never mind
DVD
[permalink | reply | tb ]
July 09, 2003
Voting machine
July 08, 2003
Bush lied Over the last couple of days the Bush administration has actually been caught lying about war, and, most astonishingly, has been getting called on it by the press (rather than just these silly weblogs). Cursor, the one in the sidebar, provides a decent overview (scroll to "July 8"). Roughly, the Times published an op-ed by Joseph C. Wilson, 4th (could such a name belong to anyone but a diplomat?), the very guy whom the government sent to Niger to check out the claims that Iraq had been trying to buy uranium ore. The piece was called What I Didn't Find In Africa, and begins: Did the Bush administration manipulate intelligence about Saddam Hussein's weapons programs to justify an invasion of Iraq? Based on my experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war, I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat. ... It was my experience in Africa that led me to play a small role in the effort to verify information about Africa's suspected link to Iraq's nonconventional weapons programs. Those news stories about that unnamed former envoy who went to Niger? That's me.Then Ari Fleischer got tripped up Monday morning by some unusually persistent questioning from the normally submissive press corps. (The official White House transcript for July 7th should appear here, but isn't up yet for some reason.) Followup from the other Josh here. David Corn weighs in in The Nation (also in the sidebar), If you blinked--or were busy buying hot-dogs and beer for a Fourth of July cookout--you might have missed the latest evidence that George W. Bush misrepresented the threat from Iraq as he guided the country into invasion and occupation in the Middle East. The day before Independence Day, Richard Kerr, a former CIA deputy director who is leading a review of the CIA's prewar intelligence on Iraq's unconventional weapons, held a series of interviews with journalists and revealed that his unfinished inquiry had so far found that the intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction had been somewhat ambiguous, that analysts at the CIA and other intelligence services had received pressure from the Bush administration, and that the CIA had not found any proof of operational ties between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's regime.and David Sanger follows up in the Times: The White House acknowledged for the first time today that President Bush was relying on incomplete and perhaps inaccurate information from American intelligence agencies when he declared, in his State of the Union speech, that Saddam Hussein had tried to purchase uranium from Africa. The White House statement appeared to undercut one of the key pieces of evidence that President Bush and his aides had cited to back their claims made prior to launching an attack against Iraq in March that Mr. Hussein was "reconstituting" his nuclear weapons program. Those claims added urgency to the White House case that military action to depose Mr. Hussein needed to be taken quickly, and could not await further inspections of the country or additional resolutions at the United Nations. The acknowledgment came after a day of questions - and sometimes contradictory answers from White House officials - about an article published on the Op-Ed page of The New York Times on Sunday by Joseph C. Wilson 4th, a former ambassador who was sent to Niger, in West Africa, last year to investigate reports of the attempted purchase. He reported back that the intelligence was likely fraudulent, a warning that White House officials say never reached them.So don't space out on the news even for one day, gentle readers. [permalink | reply | tb ]
July 07, 2003
Multitasking So for those of you who, like me, constantly feel like you're getting very little done (at work nor in general), consider: The ubiquity of technology in the lives of executives, other businesspeople and consumers has created a subculture of the Always On - and a brewing tension between productivity and freneticism. For all the efficiency gains that it seemingly provides, the constant stream of data can interrupt not just dinner and family time, but also meetings and creative time, and it can prove very tough to turn off. Some people who are persistently wired say it is not uncommon for them to be sitting in a meeting and using a hand-held device to exchange instant messages surreptitiously - with someone in the same meeting. Others may be sitting at a desk and engaging in conversation on two phones, one at each ear. At social events, or in the grandstand at their children's soccer games, they read news feeds on mobile devices instead of chatting with actual human beings.I'm not that bad, but posting regularly to this space probably doesn't help matters; nor does checking it. Good thing we periodically vanish for the weekend, eh? Bummer. Link from boingboing.
Review pending
GIA Annoyed by the prospect of a massive new federal surveillance system, two researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are celebrating the Fourth of July with a new Internet service that will let citizens create dossiers on government officials. The system will start by offering standard background information on politicians, but then go one bold step further, by asking Internet users to submit their own intelligence reports on government officials -- reports that will be published with no effort to verify their accuracy. "It's sort of a citizen's intelligence agency," said Chris Csikszentmihalyi, assistant professor at the MIT Media Lab. [permalink | reply | tb ]
July 03, 2003
Beach
fear
July 02, 2003
anything to oil A special prize, however, should be awarded to me for spotting the astounding, disingenuous hole in the following argument, posed by the company's guy and accepted uncritically by the reporter: But if there were a global shift to thermal depolymerization technologies, belowground carbon would remain there. The accoutrements of the civilized world-domestic animals and plants, buildings, artificial objects of all kinds-would then be regarded as temporary carbon sinks. At the end of their useful lives, they would be converted in thermal depolymerization machines into short-chain fuels, fertilizers, and industrial raw materials, ready for plants or people to convert them back into long chains again. So the only carbon used would be that which already existed above the surface; it could no longer dangerously accumulate in the atmosphere. "Suddenly, the whole built world just becomes a temporary carbon sink," says Paul Baskis, inventor of the thermal depolymerization process. "We would be honoring the balance of nature."If only my car turned octane into long-chain fuels... [permalink | reply | tb ]
add chris lydon
titles
July 01, 2003
Registry
Irony This section should be skipped over by most, for it is annoying and pedantic, and directed to a very few. ... I have that i-word here only to make clear what was clear to, by my estimations, about 99.9% of original hardcover readers of this book: that there is almost no irony, whatsoever, within its covers. But to hear a few people tell it, this entire book, or most of it, was/is ironic. Well. Well. Ahem. Well. Let's define irony as the dictionary does: the use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning. (There are lesser definitions, but they all serve this main one.) Now, where, keeping that definition in mind, do we find that herein? We do find some things that might have confused the reader prone to presuming this irony, so let's address them one at a time: 1. When someone kids around, it does not necessarily mean he or she is being ironic. That is, when one tells a joke, in an context, in can mean, simply, that a joke is being told. Jokes, thus, do not have to be ironic to be jokes. Further, satire is not inherently ironic. Nor is parody. Or any kind of comedy. Irony is a very specific and not all that interesting thing, and to use the word/concept to blanket half of all contemporary cultural production---which some aged arbiters seem to be doing (particularly with regard to work made by those under a certain age)---is akin to the too-common citing of "the Midwest" as the regional impediment to all national social progress (when we all know the "Midwest" is ten miles outside of any city). In other words, irony should be considered a very particular and recognizable thing, as defined above, and thus, to refer to everything odd, coincidental, eerie, absurd or strangely funny as ironic is, frankly, an abomination upon the Lord. [Re that last clause: not irony, but a simple, wholesome, American-born exaggeration]. To illustrate the many more things that are not ironic but are often referred to as such, let's look at some sample sentences, starring a wee wayward pup known as Benji, and see if we can illuminate some distinctions. This is why literary types continually soil themselves with the strain of worshipping Mr. Eggers to ever greater degrees.Sample: Benji was run over by a bus. Isn't that ironic?No: That is not ironic. That is unfortunate, but it is not ironic.Sample: It was a bright and sunny day when Benji was run over by a bus. Ironic, no?Again, no: That is not irony. It is an instance of dissonance between weather and tragedy.Sample: It is ironic that Benji was on his way to the vet when he was run over by a bus.Still: That is not irony. That is a coincidence that might be called eerie.Sample: It is ironic hta Benji was run over on the same day he misused the word ironic.But see: This is, again, a coincidence. It is wonderfully appropriate that he was run over on this day, deserving as he was of punishment, but it is not ironic.Sample: Is it not ironic that on the side of the bus that ran over Benji was an advertisement for "The Late Show with David Letterman," a show which many consider often ironic?Oh, oh: No, no. From the Brit: Most pressingly, though, there are a number of misconceptions about irony that are peculiar to recent times. The first is that September 11 spelled the end of irony. The second is that the end of irony would be the one good thing to come out of September 11. The third is that irony characterises our age to a greater degree than it has done any other. The fourth is that Americans can't do irony, and we can. The fifth is that the Germans can't do irony, either (and we still can). The sixth is that irony and cynicism are interchangeable. The seventh is that it's a mistake to attempt irony in emails and text messages, even while irony characterises our age, and so do emails. And the eighth is that "post-ironic" is an acceptable term - it is very modish to use this, as if to suggest one of three things: i) that irony has ended; ii) that postmodernism and irony are interchangeable, and can be conflated into one handy word; or iii) that we are more ironic than we used to be, and therefore need to add a prefix suggesting even greater ironic distance than irony on its own can supply. None of these things is true.Nice. [permalink | reply | tb ] |
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002
Links
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
©2001-2007 Josh Daghlian, All Rights Reserved.
|